Meeting a Recorded Production Target as an Adequacy Outcome
Abstract
The question concerns meeting the recorded team target as an outcome. The secondary ordinary least squares analysis contains 1,197 observations and uses cluster covariance. The coefficient on targeted_productivity is -0.0285, with a 95 percent interval from -0.3105 to 0.2534. Meeting the row's target is a different event from having a high absolute productivity value. Targets are part of the observation process and may be set in response to expected difficulty. Good-enough selection therefore needs an externally justified requirement. The fitted target-achievement indicator describes this file rather than certifying an operationally adequate team policy. The estimates describe the released collection and its conditioning set. No new data collection, simulator experiment, or deployment-policy evaluation is claimed.
References
F. Gao and S. Gao, “A New Strategy for Selecting Good Enough Designs Using Optimal Computing Budget Allocation,” Journal of Simulation, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 238–247, 2018.
F. Gao and S. Gao, “Selecting Good Enough Simulated Designs,” Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, pp. 1053–1058, 2017.
Productivity Prediction of Garment Employees. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2020. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.24432/C51S6D.
White, Halbert. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, 1980, pp. 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934.
Cameron, A. Colin, and Douglas L. Miller. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 50, no. 2, 2015, pp. 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317.
Rasmussen, Carl Edward, and Christopher K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, 2006. https://gaussianprocess.org/gpml/.
Ankenman, Bruce, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. “Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling.” Operations Research, vol. 58, no. 2, 2010, pp. 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0754.
Kim, Seong-Hee, and Barry L. Nelson. “A Fully Sequential Procedure for Indifference-Zone Selection in Simulation.” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, vol. 11, no. 3, 2001, pp. 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/502109.502111.
Frazier, Peter I., Warren B. Powell, and Savas Dayanik. “A Knowledge-Gradient Policy for Sequential Information Collection.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 47, no. 5, 2008, pp. 2410–2439. https://doi.org/10.1137/070693424.
Bertsimas, Dimitris, and Melvyn Sim. “The Price of Robustness.” Operations Research, vol. 52, no. 1, 2004, pp. 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1030.0065.