Response Time and Event Order in Generative Game Interfaces

Authors

  • Owen Stevens Author
  • Cole Barker Author
  • Christian Reed Author

Abstract

Rendering speed does not determine whether an interaction arrives in time to be useful. This conceptual analysis separates command reception, visible response, completion of the intended state change, and the order of competing events. It proposes reporting latency distributions alongside task consequences and visual quality under documented hardware and load. Make a game motivates the interface question, but no new timing experiment is performed. The central argument is that a faster first image can coexist with a delayed, incomplete, or wrongly ordered response, so a single frames-per-second number cannot establish responsive control.

References

  1. Meng, Zijie, et al. "Make a game: A novel paradigm for interactive game rendering." ICASSP 2026-2026 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2026.
  2. White, Halbert. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, 1980, pp. 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934.
  3. Cameron, A. Colin, and Douglas L. Miller. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 50, no. 2, 2015, pp. 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317.
  4. Greenland, Sander, Judea Pearl, and James M. Robins. “Causal Diagrams for Epidemiologic Research.” Epidemiology, vol. 10, no. 1, 1999, pp. 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199901000-00008.
  5. Benjamini, Yoav and Yosef Hochberg. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, vol. 57, no. 1, 1995, pp. 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
  6. Roberts, David R., et al. “Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure.” Ecography, vol. 40, no. 8, 2017, pp. 913-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02881.
  7. Varma, Sudhir and Richard Simon. “Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 1, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-91.
  8. Wilkinson, Mark D., et al. "The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship." Scientific Data, vol. 3, 2016, article 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
  9. Sculley, D., et al. "Hidden Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems." Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 28, 2015. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2015/hash/86df7dcfd896fcaf2674f757a2463eba-Abstract.html
  10. Bland, J. Martin, and Douglas G. Altman. "Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement." The Lancet, vol. 327, no. 8476, 1986, pp. 307-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
  11. Guo, Chuan, Geoff Pleiss, Yu Sun, and Kilian Q. Weinberger. “On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks.” Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, vol. 70, 2017, pp. 1321–1330. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v70/guo17a.html.
  12. Geifman, Yonatan, and Ran El-Yaniv. “Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networks.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.08500.
  13. Ovadia, Yaniv, et al. “Can You Trust Your Model’s Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shift.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02530.
  14. Bellemare, Marc G., et al.. "The Arcade Learning Environment: An Evaluation Platform for General Agents" arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.4708, 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4708.
  15. Agarwal, Rishabh, et al.. "Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical Precipice" arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.13264, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.13264.
  16. Cobbe, Karl, et al.. "Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learning" arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01588, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01588.
  17. Brockman, Greg, et al.. "OpenAI Gym" arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01540, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.01540.
  18. Ha, David and Jürgen Schmidhuber. "World Models" arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.10122, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.10122.
  19. Hafner, Danijar, et al.. "Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imagination" arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01603, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01603.
  20. Micheli, Vincent, et al.. "Transformers are Sample-Efficient World Models" arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.00588, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.00588.
  21. Alonso, Eloi, et al.. "Diffusion for World Modeling: Visual Details Matter in Atari" arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.12399, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.12399.
  22. Valevski, Dani, et al.. "Diffusion Models Are Real-Time Game Engines" arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.14837, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.14837.
  23. Bruce, Jake, et al.. "Genie: Generative Interactive Environments" arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15391, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15391.
  24. Zhang, Richard, et al.. "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric" arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.03924, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03924.
  25. Unterthiner, Thomas, et al.. "Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challenges" arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01717, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.01717.
  26. Wang, Zhou, Alan C. Bovik, Hamid R. Sheikh, and Eero P. Simoncelli. "Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity." IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 13, no. 4, 2004, pp. 600-612. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.
  27. Schwarzer, Max, et al.. "Bigger, Better, Faster: Human-level Atari with human-level efficiency" arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19452, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19452.
  28. Sutton, Richard S., and Andrew G. Barto. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. 2nd ed., MIT Press, 2018. http://incompleteideas.net/book/the-book-2nd.html.
  29. Levine, Sergey, Aviral Kumar, George Tucker, and Justin Fu. “Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problems.” arXiv, 2020, arXiv:2005.01643. https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01643.
  30. Kumar, Aviral, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, and Sergey Levine. “Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learning.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, 2020, pp. 1179–1191. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04779.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-24

Issue

Vol. 2 (2026): Archive issue of 2026-08-24

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Owen Stevens, Cole Barker, Christian Reed

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.