An Illustrative Heating Boundary before Fine Design Ranking
Abstract
The question concerns linear probability of illustrative heating load at least 30. The secondary ordinary least squares analysis contains 768 observations and uses HC3 covariance. The coefficient on X5 is 0.1370, with a 95 percent interval from 0.0847 to 0.1893. The cutoff translates a continuous design output into an event whose denominator is the released configurations. Changing this analytical boundary would change the screening task. It is deliberately separate from any comfort or regulatory standard. Good-enough selection can motivate screening, but would need independent simulation evidence to demonstrate that its allocation identifies adequate configurations efficiently. The estimates describe the released collection and its conditioning set. No new data collection, simulator experiment, or deployment-policy evaluation is claimed.
References
F. Gao and S. Gao, “A New Strategy for Selecting Good Enough Designs Using Optimal Computing Budget Allocation,” Journal of Simulation, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 238–247, 2018.
F. Gao and S. Gao, “Selecting Good Enough Simulated Designs,” Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, pp. 1053–1058, 2017.
Athanasios Tsanas, Angeliki Xifara. Energy Efficiency. UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2012. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.24432/C51307.
White, Halbert. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, 1980, pp. 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934.
Cameron, A. Colin, and Douglas L. Miller. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 50, no. 2, 2015, pp. 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317.
Rasmussen, Carl Edward, and Christopher K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, 2006. https://gaussianprocess.org/gpml/.
Ankenman, Bruce, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. “Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling.” Operations Research, vol. 58, no. 2, 2010, pp. 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0754.
Kim, Seong-Hee, and Barry L. Nelson. “A Fully Sequential Procedure for Indifference-Zone Selection in Simulation.” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, vol. 11, no. 3, 2001, pp. 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/502109.502111.
Frazier, Peter I., Warren B. Powell, and Savas Dayanik. “A Knowledge-Gradient Policy for Sequential Information Collection.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 47, no. 5, 2008, pp. 2410–2439. https://doi.org/10.1137/070693424.
Bertsimas, Dimitris, and Melvyn Sim. “The Price of Robustness.” Operations Research, vol. 52, no. 1, 2004, pp. 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1030.0065.